Washington, D.C. — For more than four years, the world endured one of the most profound public health, economic, and social crises in modern history. Decisions affecting billions of people—including lockdowns, vaccine mandates, prolonged school closures, mask mandates, unprecedented restrictions on travel and individual freedoms—were implemented in the name of emergency response.

Today, however, many of those decisions are being seriously challenged by one of the most significant official documents ever produced in the United States on the pandemic: the Final Report of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic of the U.S. House of Representatives, the culmination of two years of investigations, public hearings, and extensive document reviews.

Spanning more than 500 pages, the report delivers sharply critical conclusions regarding the actions of numerous U.S. institutions. Some of its findings echo concerns previously raised by scientists and researchers, while others remain the subject of vigorous debate. Regardless of where one stands, it represents one of the most comprehensive institutional efforts to examine what happened during the COVID-19 pandemic.

KEY FINDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE

According to the committee, COVID-19 originated from an accidental laboratory leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China, rather than from a natural animal-to-human spillover event.

To support this conclusion, the report points to several factors, including biological characteristics of the virus that, in the committee’s assessment, are inconsistent with a natural origin.

THE WHO AND CHINA

The committee also delivers a highly critical assessment of the World Health Organization (WHO). At the same time, it accuses the Chinese government of restricting access to critical data and failing to cooperate fully with international investigations into the origins of the pandemic.

MASKS, SOCIAL DISTANCING, AND LOCKDOWNS

According to the report:

• The six-foot social distancing rule was introduced without solid scientific evidence.
• During previous testimony, Dr. Anthony Fauci stated that the recommendation had essentially “appeared out of nowhere.”
• No conclusive evidence was found supporting the effectiveness of broad mask mandates.
• Repeated shifts in public health messaging contributed to a significant erosion of public trust.

The committee further concludes that prolonged lockdowns resulted in:

• severe economic damage;
• widespread psychological harm;
• deterioration in physical health;
• particularly significant negative effects on children and young adults.

SCHOOL CLOSURES

One of the report’s strongest criticisms concerns the prolonged closure of schools. According to the committee:

• the available scientific evidence did not justify keeping schools closed for extended periods;
• children played only a limited role in transmitting the virus;
• millions of students suffered unprecedented learning loss;
• anxiety, depression, and other mental health problems increased significantly among young people.

VACCINES

According to the report:

• COVID-19 vaccines did not prevent viral transmission;
• several FDA scientists reportedly expressed concerns about the speed of the approval process;
• vaccine mandates were not adequately supported by the available scientific evidence;
• naturally acquired immunity was undervalued in public policy;
• the vaccine adverse event reporting system exhibited significant shortcomings;
• the vaccine injury compensation system remains inefficient and lacks transparency.

FRAUD AND WASTE

The report also concludes that:

• at least $64 billion was lost to fraud involving the Paycheck Protection Program;
• more than $191 billion was lost through fraudulent unemployment benefit claims;
• at least half of the stolen funds allegedly ended up in the hands of international criminal organizations;
• more than 160,000 businesses closed during the pandemic, many of them permanently.

CENSORSHIP

One of the report’s most controversial sections addresses the management of public information.

According to the committee:

• information that was later considered plausible was initially dismissed as misinformation;
• the laboratory leak hypothesis was aggressively challenged during the early years of the pandemic;
• the Biden administration allegedly pressured certain social media platforms to restrict COVID-19-related content.

THE SENATE–FAUCI CONFRONTATION

As the report continues to fuel public debate, political tensions escalated during Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent appearance before the U.S. Senate.

When questioned by senators, Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution more than one hundred times, declining to answer questions. The accompanying video captures only a portion of Senator Josh Hawley’s sharp criticism during the hearing.

This video is originally in English. If YouTube automatically selects a dubbed audio track, open Settings → Audio track → English (Original).

AN OPEN WOUND THAT CONTINUES TO BLEED

Years after the pandemic, a substantial body of evidence has emerged, and the subcommittee’s investigation seeks to bring greater clarity to many of the most controversial aspects of the crisis.

COVID-19 marked one of the most consequential periods in modern history. The committee’s report concludes that the virus did not originate naturally, a position that many researchers had advanced during the pandemic.

The time has come for the full truth to emerge and for accountability to be assigned to those—including Fauci, Gates, and Epstein (see: https://www.laverita.info/pensiero-unico/covid-piano-di-epstein-gates – you can read it through a translator), as well as numerous media commentators—who are alleged to have personally profited from one of humanity’s greatest tragedies.